Moody's also affirms the ratings of two classes of notes
New York, February 11, 2015 -- Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the ratings on the following notes
issued by ARCap 2003-1 Resecuritization Trust Collateralized Debt
Obligation Certificates, Series 2003-1. ("ARCap
2003-1"):
Cl. B, Upgraded to A2 (sf); previously on Mar 5,
2014 Upgraded to Baa1 (sf)
Cl. C, Upgraded to Ba1 (sf); previously on Mar 5,
2014 Upgraded to Ba3 (sf)
Cl. D, Upgraded to Caa1 (sf); previously on Mar 5,
2014 Affirmed Caa3 (sf)
Moody's has also affirmed the ratings on the following notes:
Cl. E, Affirmed C (sf); previously on Mar 5, 2014
Affirmed C (sf)
Cl. F, Affirmed C (sf); previously on Mar 5, 2014
Affirmed C (sf)
RATINGS RATIONALE
Moody's has upgraded the ratings on three classes due to material
improvement in the pool's WARF, which more than offsets the
decrease in WARR and the repayment of principal on the underlying high
credit risk collateral. The affirmations are a result of key transaction
metrics are commensurate with existing ratings. The rating action
is the result of Moody's on-going surveillance of commercial
real estate collateralized debt obligation (CRE CDO and Re-REMIC)
transactions.
ARCap 2003-1 is a cash transaction backed by a portfolio of commercial
mortgage backed securities (CMBS) (100% of the pool balance) issued
between 1999 and 2003. As of the trustee's December 31,
2014 trustee report, the aggregate note balance of the transaction,
including preferred shares, is $338.3 million,
as compared to $347.6 million at last review due to collateral
amortization.
Moody's has identified the following as key indicators of the expected
loss in CRE CDO transactions: the weighted average rating factor
(WARF), the weighted average life (WAL), the weighted average
recovery rate (WARR), and Moody's asset correlation (MAC).
Moody's typically models these as actual parameters for static deals
and as covenants for managed deals.
WARF is a primary measure of the credit quality of a CRE CDO pool.
Moody's has updated its assessments for the collateral it does not
rate. The rating agency modeled a bottom-dollar WARF of
4,039, compared to 6,017 at last review. The
current ratings on the Moody's-rated collateral and the assessments
of the non-Moody's rated collateral follow: Aaa-Aa3
(5.4% compared to 0.3% at last review);
A1-A3 (0% compared to 5.1% at last review);
Baa1-Baa3 (16.4% compared to 10.8%
at last review); Ba1-Ba3 (28% compared to 5.1%
at last review); B1-B3 (12.9% compared to 22%
at last review); and Caa1-Ca/C (37.3%,
compared to 56.7% at last review).
Moody's modeled a WAL of 3.2 years, as compared to 3.6
at last review. The WAL is based on assumptions about extensions
on the underlying collateral.
Moody's modeled a fixed WARR of 0%, as compared to
6% at last review.
Moody's modeled a MAC of 100%, same as last review.
Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:
The principal methodology used in this rating was "Moody's Approach to
Rating SF CDOs" published in March 2014. Please see the Credit
Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the rating:
The performance of the notes is subject to uncertainty, because
it is sensitive to the performance of the underlying portfolio,
which in turn depends on economic and credit conditions that are subject
to change. The servicing decisions of the master and special servicer
and surveillance by the operating advisor with respect to the collateral
interests and oversight of the transaction will also affect the performance
of the rated notes.
Moody's Parameter Sensitivities: Changes to any one or more
of the key parameters could have rating implications for some of the rated
notes, although a change in one key parameter assumption could be
offset by a change in one or more of the other key parameter assumptions.
The rated notes are particularly sensitive to changes in the rating recovery
rates of the underlying collateral and credit assessments. Increasing
the recovery rate of 100% of the collateral pool by 5% would
result in an average modeled rating movement on the rated notes of zero
to one notch (e.g., one notch up implies a ratings
movement of Baa3 to Baa2).
The primary sources of uncertainty in Moody's assumptions are the
extent of growth in the current macroeconomic environment given the weak
recovery and certain commercial real estate property markets. Commercial
real estate property values continue to improve modestly, along
with a rise in investment activity and stabilization in core property
type performance. Limited new construction and moderate job growth
have aided this improvement. However, sustained growth will
not be possible until investment increases steadily for a significant
period, non-performing properties are cleared from the pipeline
and fears of a euro area recession abate.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For further specification of Moody's key rating assumptions and
sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and
Sensitivity to Assumptions of the disclosure form.
Moody's did not receive or take into account a third-party
assessment on the due diligence performed regarding the underlying assets
or financial instruments related to the monitoring of this transaction
in the past six months.
The analysis relies on a Monte Carlo simulation that generates a large
number of collateral loss or cash flow scenarios, which on average
meet key metrics Moody's determines based on its assessment of the
collateral characteristics. Moody's then evaluates each simulated
scenario using model that replicates the relevant structural features
and payment allocation rules of the transaction, to derive losses
or payments for each rated instrument. The average loss a rated
instrument incurs in all of the simulated collateral loss or cash flow
scenarios, which Moody's weights based on its assumptions
about the likelihood of events in such scenarios actually occurring,
results in the expected loss of the rated instrument.
Moody's quantitative analysis entails an evaluation of scenarios
that stress factors contributing to sensitivity of ratings and take into
account the likelihood of severe collateral losses or impaired cash flows.
Moody's weights the impact on the rated instruments based on its
assumptions of the likelihood of the events in such scenarios occurring.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit
support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and
whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the
associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity.
Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures,
if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure
to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit
rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating
review.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.
Scarlett Shao
Associate Analyst
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Deryk Meherik
VP - Sr Credit Officer/Manager
Structured Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's upgrades ratings of three classes of notes issued by ARCap 2003-1