US $128.3 million of debt securities affected
New York, May 19, 2014 -- Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the ratings on following notes
issued by Palisades CDO Ltd.:
U.S. $366,000,000 CLASS A-1A FLOATING
RATE NOTES DUE JULY 2039 (current outstanding balance of $39,189,029),
Upgraded to B1 (sf); previously on March 6, 2014 Caa3 (sf)
Placed Under Review for Possible Upgrade
U.S. $6,000,000 CLASS A-1B 4.69%
NOTES DUE JULY 2039 (current outstanding balance of $642,443),
Upgraded to B1 (sf); previously on March 6, 2014 Caa3 (sf)
Placed Under Review for Possible Upgrade
U.S. $88,500,000 CLASS A-2 FLOATING
RATE NOTES DUE JULY 2039 Notes, Upgraded to Caa3 (sf); previously
on October 29, 2009 Downgraded to Ca (sf)
Palisades CDO Ltd., issued in July 2004, is a collateralized
debt obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of RMBS, ABS,
and CDOs originated in years 2000-2007.
RATINGS RATIONALE
These rating actions are primarily due to the deleveraging of the senior
notes and an increase in the transaction's over-collateralization
ratios since September 2013. The Class A-1 notes have been
collectively paid down by approximately 51%, or $40.9
million since September 2013. Based on Moody's calculations,
the over-collateralization (OC) ratios for the Class A-1
and A-2 Notes are currently at 280.1% and 86.9%,
respectively, versus September 2013 levels of 159.8%
and 76.2%, respectively. Additionally,
Moody's notes that the Class A-1 notes benefit from diversion
of interest proceeds due to the failure of the Class A/B OC test.
Approximately $0.5 million of interest proceeds were used
to amortize the Class A-1 notes on the April 2014 payment date.
The deal also benefits from the updates to Moody's SF CDO methodology
described in "Moody's Approach to Rating SF CDOs" published
on March 6, 2014. These updates include: (i) lowering
the resecuritization stress factors for RMBS (US Prime, Subprime,
Manufactured Housing), CDOs exposed to investment grade corporate
assets, and ABS backed by franchise loans or by mutual fund fees;
(ii) using a common table of recovery rates for all structured finance
assets (except for CMBS and SF CDO); and (iii) providing more guidance
on the rating caps we apply to deals experiencing event of default.
In taking the foregoing actions, Moody's also announced that it
had concluded its review of its rating(s) on the issuer's Class A-1A
and Class A-1B Notes announced on March 6, 2014. At
that time, Moody's said that it had placed the rating(s) on
review for upgrade as a result of the aforementioned methodology updates.
Methodology Underlying the Rating Action
The principal methodology used in this rating was "Moody's Approach to
Rating SF CDOs" published in March 2014. Please see the Credit
Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
Factors That Would Lead To an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Rating:
This transaction is subject to a number of factors and circumstances that
could lead to either an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings, as
described below:
1) Macro-economic uncertainty: Primary causes of uncertainty
about assumptions are the extent of any slowdown in growth in the current
macroeconomic environment and in the residential real estate property
markets. The residential real estate property market is subject
to uncertainty about housing prices; the pace of residential mortgage
foreclosures, loan modifications and refinancing; the unemployment
rate; and interest rates.
2) Deleveraging: One source of uncertainty in this transaction is
whether deleveraging from unscheduled principal proceeds, recoveries
from defaulted assets, and excess interest proceeds will continue
and at what pace. Faster deleveraging than Moody's expects
could have a significant impact on the notes' ratings.
3) Recovery of defaulted assets: The amount of recoveries received
from defaulted assets reported by the trustee and those that Moody's
assumes as having defaulted as well as the timing of these recoveries
create additional uncertainty. Moody's analyzed defaulted
assets assuming no recoveries, and therefore, realization
of any recoveries in the future would positively impact the notes'
ratings.
Loss and Cash Flow Analysis:
Moody's applies a Monte Carlo simulation framework in Moody's
CDOROM™ to model the loss distribution for SF CDOs. The simulated
defaults and recoveries for each of the Monte Carlo scenarios define the
reference pool's loss distribution. Moody's then uses
the loss distribution as an input in the CDOEdge™ cash flow model.
In addition to the base case analysis, Moody's also conducted sensitivity
analyses to test the impact of a number of default probabilities on the
rated notes. Below is a summary of the impact of different sensitivity
analyses on all of the rated notes (by the difference in the number of
notches versus the current model output, for which a positive difference
corresponds to lower expected loss):
Ba1 and below ratings notched up by two rating notches:
Class A-1A: +2
Class A-1B: +2
Class A-2: 0
Ba1 and below ratings notched down by two notches:
Class A-1A: -2
Class A-1B: -2
Class A-2: 0
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For further specification of Moody's key rating assumptions and
sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and
Sensitivity to Assumptions of the disclosure form.
Moody's did not receive or take into account a third-party
assessment on the due diligence performed regarding the underlying assets
or financial instruments related to the monitoring of this transaction
in the past six months.
Moody's describes its loss and cash flow analysis in the section
"Ratings Rationale" of this press release.
As the section on loss and cash flow analysis describes, Moody's
quantitative analysis entails an evaluation of scenarios that stress factors
contributing to sensitivity of ratings and take into account the likelihood
of severe collateral losses or impaired cash flows. Moody's
weights the impact on the rated instruments based on its assumptions of
the likelihood of the events in such scenarios occurring.
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit
support from the primary entity(ies) of this rating action, and
whose ratings may change as a result of this rating action, the
associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity.
Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures,
if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure
to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit
rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating
review.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
the rating.
Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.
Aniket Deshpande
Analyst
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
David Ham
VP - Senior Credit Officer
Structured Finance Group
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Releasing Office:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's upgrades ratings on $128.3 million of SF CDO notes issued by Palisades CDO Ltd.