USD $276 million of debt securities affected
New York, February 11, 2011 -- Moody's Investors Service announced today that it has upgraded the ratings
of the following notes issued by Rosedale CLO Ltd.:
U.S.$25,000,000 Class A-1R First
Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Revolving Notes Due 2021 (current
outstanding balance of $23,808,628.08),
Upgraded to Aa2 (sf); previously on June 22, 2009 Downgraded
to A2 (sf);
U.S.$25,000,000 Class A-1D First
Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Delayed Draw Notes Due 2021 (current
outstanding balance of $23,808,628.08),
Upgraded to Aa2 (sf); previously on June 22, 2009 Downgraded
to A2 (sf);
U.S.$106,000,000 Class A-1A First
Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Term Notes Due 2021 (current outstanding
balance of $100,948,583.05), Upgraded
to Aa2 (sf); previously on June 22, 2009 Downgraded to A2 (sf);
U.S.$60,000,000 Class A-1S First
Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Term Notes Due 2021 (current outstanding
balance of $56,735,640.93), Upgraded to
Aaa (sf); previously on June 22, 2009 Downgraded to Aa2 (sf);
U.S.$8,500,000 Class A-1J First
Priority Senior Secured Floating Rate Term Notes Due 2021, Upgraded
to Aa3 (sf); previously on June 22, 2009 Downgraded to Baa1
(sf);
U.S.$22,000,000 Class B Second Priority
Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes Due 2021, Upgraded to A3 (sf);
previously on June 22, 2009 Downgraded to Ba1 (sf);
U.S.$15,500,000 Class C Third Priority
Senior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due 2021, Upgraded
to Ba1 (sf); previously on November 23, 2010 Caa2 (sf) Placed
Under Review for Possible Upgrade;
U.S.$6,500,000 Class D-1 Fourth
Priority Mezzanine Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due 2021, Upgraded
to Caa1 (sf); previously on November 23, 2010 Ca (sf) Placed
Under Review for Possible Upgrade;
U.S.$10,000,000 Class D-2 Fourth
Priority Mezzanine Deferrable Step-Up Notes Due 2021 (current outstanding
balance of $8,359,875.00), Upgraded to
Caa1 (sf); previously on November 23, 2010 Ca (sf) Placed Under
Review for Possible Upgrade;
U.S.$9,000,000 Class E Fifth Priority
Mezzanine Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due 2021 (current outstanding
balance of $10,149,084.92), Upgraded to
Caa3 (sf); previously on June 22, 2009 Downgraded to C (sf).
RATINGS RATIONALE
According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes
result primarily from improvement in the credit quality of the underlying
portfolio and an increase in the transaction's overcollateralization
ratios since the rating action in June 2009.
Improvement in the credit quality is observed through an improvement in
the average credit rating (as measured by the weighted average rating
factor) and a decrease in the proportion of securities from issuers rated
Caa1 and below. In particular, as of the latest trustee report
dated January 14, 2011, the weighted average rating factor
is currently 2563 compared to 2631 in the May 2009 report, and securities
rated Caa1/CCC+ or lower make up approximately 3.5%
of the underlying portfolio versus 7.8% in May 2009.
Additionally, defaulted securities total about $12.5
million of the underlying portfolio compared to $23.9 million
in May 2009.
The overcollateralization ratios of the rated notes have also improved
since the rating action in June 2009. The Class A/B, Class
C, Class D and Class E overcollateralization ratios are reported
at 118.80%, 111.50%, 105.27%
and 101.41%, respectively, versus May 2009 levels
of 110.64%, 103.99%, 98.96%
and 95.42%, respectively. Moody's also
notes that the Class C, Class D and Class E Notes are no longer
deferring interest and that all previously deferred interest on the Class
C Notes and Class D Notes has been paid in full.
Due to the impact of revised and updated key assumptions referenced in
"Moody's Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" and
"Annual Sector Review (2009): Global CLOs," key
model inputs used by Moody's in its analysis, such as par,
weighted average rating factor, diversity score, and weighted
average recovery rate, may be different from the trustee's reported
numbers. In its base case, Moody's analyzed the underlying
collateral pool to have a performing par and principal proceeds balance
of $278 million, defaulted par of $13 million,
a weighted average default probability of 26.26% (implying
a WARF of 3475), a weighted average recovery rate upon default of
43.70%, and a diversity score of 60. These
default and recovery properties of the collateral pool are incorporated
in cash flow model analysis where they are subject to stresses as a function
of the target rating of each CLO liability being reviewed. The
default probability is derived from the credit quality of the collateral
pool and Moody's expectation of the remaining life of the collateral
pool. The average recovery rate to be realized on future defaults
is based primarily on the seniority of the assets in the collateral pool.
In each case, historical and market performance trends and collateral
manager latitude for trading the collateral are also factors.
Rosedale CLO Ltd., issued in June 2006, is a collateralized
loan obligation backed primarily by a portfolio of senior secured loans.
The principal methodology used in this rating was "Moody's Approach to
Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in August 2009.
Moody's Investors Service did not receive or take into account a
third-party due diligence report on the underlying assets or financial
instruments related to the monitoring of this transaction in the past
six months.
Moody's modeled the transaction using the Binomial Expansion Technique,
as described in Section 2.3.2.1 of the "Moody's Approach
to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" rating methodology published
in August 2009.
In addition to the base case analysis described above, Moody's also
performed sensitivity analyses to test the impact on all rated notes of
various default probabilities. Below is a summary of the impact
of different default probabilities (expressed in terms of WARF levels)
on all rated notes (shown in terms of the number of notches' difference
versus the current model output, where a positive difference corresponds
to lower expected losses), assuming that all other factors are held
equal:
Moody's Adjusted WARF -- 20% (2780)
Class X: 0
Class A-1R: +1
Class A-1D: +1
Class A-1A: +1
Class A-1S: +2
Class A-1J: +2
Class B: +2
Class C: +2
Class D-1: +2
Class D-2: +2
Class E: +2
Moody's Adjusted WARF + 20% (4170)
Class X: 0
Class A-1R: -1
Class A-1D: -1
Class A-1A: -1
Class A-1S: -2
Class A-1J: -2
Class B: -2
Class C: -2
Class D-1: -2
Class D-2: -2
Class E: -2
Moody's notes that this transaction is subject to a high level of
macroeconomic uncertainty, as evidenced by 1) uncertainties of credit
conditions in the general economy and 2) the large concentration of speculative-grade
debt maturing between 2012 and 2014 which may create challenges for issuers
to refinance. CDO notes' performance may also be impacted
by 1) the manager's investment strategy and behavior and 2) divergence
in legal interpretation of CDO documentation by different transactional
parties due to embedded ambiguities.
Sources of additional performance uncertainties are described below:
1) Recovery of defaulted assets: Market value fluctuations in defaulted
assets reported by the trustee and those assumed to be defaulted by Moody's
may create volatility in the deal's overcollateralization levels.
Further, the timing of recoveries and the manager's decision
to work out versus sell defaulted assets create additional uncertainties.
Moody's analyzed defaulted recoveries assuming the lower of the
market price and the recovery rate in order to account for potential volatility
in market prices.
2) Weighted average life: The notes' ratings are sensitive
to the weighted average life assumption of the portfolio, which
may be extended due to the manager's decision to reinvest into new
issue loans or other loans with longer maturities and/or participate in
amend-to-extend offerings. Moody's tested for
a possible extension of the actual weighted average life in its analysis.
3) Other collateral quality metrics: The deal is allowed to reinvest
and the manager has the ability to deteriorate the collateral quality
metrics' existing cushions against the covenant levels. Moody's
analyzed the impact of assuming lower of reported and covenanted values
for weighted average rating factor, weighted average spread,
weighted average coupon, and diversity score.
Further information on Moody's analysis of this transaction is available
on www.moodys.com. In addition, Moody's publishes
a weekly summary of structured finance credit, ratings and methodologies,
available to all registered users of our web site, at www.moodys.com/SFQuickCheck.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
Information sources used to prepare the credit rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, public information, and confidential
and proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.
Moody's Investors Service considers the quality of information available
on the issuer or obligation satisfactory for the purposes of maintaining
a credit rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses
in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources
Moody's considers to be reliable including, when appropriate,
independent third-party sources. However, Moody's
is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or
validate information received in the rating process.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on Moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some Credit Ratings were first released goes back to
a time before Moody's Investors Service's Credit Ratings were fully digitized
and accurate data may not be available. Consequently, Moody's
Investors Service provides a date that it believes is the most reliable
and accurate based on the information that is available to it.
Please see the ratings disclosure page on our website www.moodys.com
for further information.
Please see the Credit Policy page on Moodys.com for the methodologies
used in determining ratings, further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
New York
Connie Li
Associate Analyst
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
New York
Ramon O. Torres
Senior Vice President
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's Investors Service
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's upgrades the ratings of notes issued by Rosedale CLO Ltd.
