New York, August 01, 2011 -- Moody's Investors Service announced today that it has upgraded the ratings
of four Composite Obligations and six classes of notes issued by ZAIS
Investment Grade Limited VI. The classes of notes affected by today's
rating actions are as follows:
U.S. $206,000,000 Class A-1 Senior
Secured Floating Rate Notes, Upgraded to Aaa (sf); previously
on June 24, 2011 A1 (sf) Placed Under Review for Possible Upgrade
U.S. $54,750,000 Class A-2a Senior
Secured Floating Rate Notes, graded to Aa3 (sf) and Remains On Review
for Possible Upgrade; previously on June 24, 2011 Ba1 (sf)
Placed Under Review for Possible Upgrade
U.S. $8,250,000 Class A-2b Senior
Secured Fixed Rate Notes, Upgraded to Aa3 (sf) and Remains On Review
for Possible Upgrade; previously on June 24, 2011 Ba1 (sf)
Placed Under Review for Possible Upgrade
U.S. $21,000,000 Class A-3 Senior
Secured Floating Rate Notes, Upgraded to Baa1 (sf) and Remains On
Review for Possible Upgrade; previously on June 24, 2011 B1
(sf) Placed Under Review for Possible Upgrade
U.S. $6,400,000 Class B-1 Senior
Secured Floating Rate Notes, Upgraded to Ba2 (sf) and Remains On
Review for Possible Upgrade; previously on June 24, 2011 Caa3
(sf) Placed Under Review for Possible Upgrade
U.S. $36,600,000 Class B-2 Senior
Secured Fixed Rate Notes, Upgraded to Ba2 (sf) and Remains On Review
for Possible Upgrade; previously on June 24, 2011 Caa3 (sf)
Placed Under Review for Possible Upgrade
U.S. $1,250,000 Type II Composite Obligations,
Upgraded to Aa1 (sf) and Remains On Review for Possible Upgrade;
previously on June 24, 2011 Baa3 (sf) Placed Under Review for Possible
Upgrade
U.S. $10,500,000 Type IV Composite Obligations,
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf) and Remains On Review for Possible Upgrade;
previously on June 24, 2011 Caa2 (sf) Placed Under Review for Possible
Upgrade
U.S. $15,000,000 Type V Composite Obligations,
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf) and Remains On Review for Possible Upgrade;
previously on June 24, 2011 Caa2 (sf) Placed Under Review for Possible
Upgrade
U.S. $8,600,000 Type VI Composite Obligations,
Upgraded to Ba1 (sf) and Remains On Review for Possible Upgrade;
previously on June 24, 2011 Caa2 (sf) Placed Under Review for Possible
Upgrade
RATINGS RATIONALE
According to Moody's, the rating actions taken on the notes and
composite obligations result primarily from the improvement of the credit
quality of the portfolio.
As of the latest trustee report dated July 20, 2011, the Class
A and Class B overcollateralization ratios are reported at 140.61%
and 115.28%, respectively, versus February 2011
levels of 126.32% and 103.56%, respectively
and currently the Class A OC, B OC and A IC are in compliance.
Based on this July report the WARF reported is 1575 versus February 2011
reported WARF of 2276. The Class B-1 and B-2 notes
are receiving their interest payments but a deferred interest balance
is still outstanding on the Notes and will only be paid down once all
the OC and IC tests are passing.
Following an announcement by Moody's on June 22nd that nearly all
CLO tranches currently rated Aa1 and below were placed on review for possible
upgrade ("Moody's places 4,220 tranches from 611 U.S.
and 171 European CLO transactions on review for upgrade"),
98 tranches of U.S. and European Structured Finance (SF)
CDOs with material exposure to CLOs were also placed on review for possible
upgrade ("Moody's places 98 tranches from 19 U.S.
and 3 European SF CDO transactions with exposure to CLOs on review for
upgrade"). Today's rating action on the notes reflects
CLO tranche upgrades that have taken place thus far, as well as
a two notch adjustment for CLO tranches which remain on review for possible
upgrade. According to Moody's, 30% of the collateral
has been upgraded since June 22nd, and 47% remains on review.
ZAIS Investment Grade Limited VI. is a collateralized debt obligation
backed primarily by a portfolio of CLOs, and SF CDOs.
The principal methodology used in this rating was "Moody's Approach to
Rating SF CDOs" published in November 2010. Please see the Credit
Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
Moody's applied the Monte Carlo simulation framework within CDOROMv2.8
to model the loss distribution for SF CDOs. Within this framework,
defaults are generated so that they occur with the frequency indicated
by the adjusted default probability pool (the default probability associated
with the current rating multiplied by the Resecuritization Stress) for
each credit in the reference pool. Specifically, correlated
defaults are simulated using a normal (or Gaussian) copula model that
applies the asset correlation framework. Recovery rates for defaulted
credits are generated by applying within the simulation the distributional
assumptions, including correlation between recovery values.
Together, the simulated defaults and recoveries across each of the
Monte Carlo scenarios define the loss distribution for the reference pool.
Once the loss distribution for the collateral has been calculated,
each collateral loss scenario derived through the CDOROM loss distribution
is associated with the interest and principal received by the rated liability
classes via the CDOEdge cash-flow model. The cash flow model
takes into account the following: collateral cash flows, the
transaction covenants, the priority of payments (waterfall) for
interest and principal proceeds received from portfolio assets,
reinvestment assumptions, the timing of defaults, interest-rate
scenarios and foreign exchange risk (if present). The Expected
Loss for each tranche is the weighted average of losses to each tranche
across all the scenarios, where the weight is the likelihood of
the scenario occurring. Moody's defines the loss as the shortfall
in the present value of cash flows to the tranche relative to the present
value of the promised cash flows. The present values are calculated
using the promised tranche coupon rate as the discount rate. For
floating rate tranches, the discount rate is based on the promised
spread over Libor and the assumed Libor scenario.
REGULATORY DISCLOSURES
For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series
or category/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings
are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's
rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular
rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the
support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings,
this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation
to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive
rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt,
in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed
prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would
have affected the rating. For further information please see the
ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.
Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following:
parties involved in the ratings, and public information.
Moody's did not receive or take into account a third party assessment
on the due diligence performed regarding the underlying assets or financial
instruments related to the monitoring of this transaction in the past
six months.
Moody's considers the quality of information available on the rated entity,
obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating.
Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses
in assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody's
considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent
third-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditor
and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information
received in the rating process.
Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Process
page on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaning
of each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.
Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com
for the last rating action and the rating history.
The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a time
before Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may not
be available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date that
it believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the information
that is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure page
on our website www.moodys.com for further information.
Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to
the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued
the rating.
New York
Ainat Koller
Associate Analyst
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
New York
Evan Tepper
Vice President - Senior Analyst
Structured Finance Group
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
U.S.A.
JOURNALISTS: 212-553-0376
SUBSCRIBERS: 212-553-1653
Moody's upgrades the ratings of six classes of notes and four composite obligations issued by ZAIS Investment Grade Limited VI, Ltd., a SF CDO