The U.S. banking agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) recently proposed rules implementing the final Basel III reforms, also known as the Basel III Endgame. The rules, which have been proposed post the banking turmoil in March 2023, seek to further strengthen the banking system by applying a broader set of capital requirements to more large banks. In a separate notice, the Federal Reserve Board also proposed certain adjustments to the calculation of the capital surcharge for the largest and most complex banks. The comment period on both proposals, which is longer than usual, ends on November 30, 2023 while the speculation indicates that the U.S. regulators are likely to finalize these rules by mid-2024.
Summary of proposed changes
The proposal would apply to larger banks with more than USD 100 billion in total consolidated assets but would not impact the community banks. For banks below $100 billion in total assets, the market risk provisions of the proposal would also apply to those with significant trading activity. For banks with more than USD 100 billion in assets, the proposal would:
- Revise aspects of the capital framework related to credit risk, market risk, operational risk, and financial derivative risk.
- Improve consistency and replace internal-models-based capital requirements for credit and operational risk currently included in Category I or II capital standards with new, risk-sensitive standardized requirements (the “expanded risk-based approach”) that would apply to all banking organizations with USD 100 billion or more in total assets (that is, banking organizations subject to Category I, II, III, or IV capital standards)
- Require banks to include unrealized gains and losses from certain securities in their capital ratios.
- Subject these banks to the supplementary leverage ratio requirement and the countercyclical capital buffer, if activated.
- Replace the current approaches for measuring capital requirements for credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk for OTC derivative contracts with non-model-based approaches, including a less burdensome option intended for less complex banking organizations.
- Revise certain existing qualitative disclosure requirements and introduce new and enhanced qualitative disclosure requirements related to the proposed revisions to the capital rule.
- Result in revisions to the reporting forms of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) for affected banking organizations (to be proposed separately).
Proposed timelines
As proposed, the implementation of these final components of Basel III reforms should start from July 01, 2025, with full compliance expected by July 01, 2028. The transition provisions built into the proposal are intended to give banks sufficient time to adapt to the changes while minimizing any potential adverse impact. For banking organizations subject to Category III or IV standards, the requirement to reflect in regulatory capital accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), which includes unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, would be phased in over three years starting July 01, 2025.
Impact and market response
The proposed rules are estimated to bring into this regulatory net another 16 domestic banks and the intermediate holding companies of 12 foreign banks. As per the press release from US Agencies, the proposed improvements to strengthen the banking system are estimated to result in an aggregate 16% increase in common equity tier 1 capital requirements for affected bank holding companies, with the increase principally affecting the largest and most complex banks. However, various estimates from market participants differ and peg this increase to be in the range of 16% to 25%. The proposal is receiving adverse response from certain market participants and even certain members of the regulatory bodies in the country are divided in their stance toward these proposed rules. Yet another group of stakeholders emphasize the need for a balance between safeguarding the banking system and the costs associated with requiring higher capital from the banks. Considering that the proposal has a longer than usual comment period, the existing, market sentiment, and the fact that regulators say that "all comments will be carefully considered," it is speculated by some that the there is a possibility that the final version of the proposal may be quite different from this proposed version.
Related regulatory references:
LEARN MORE
Find out how we can help
Moody’s brings together data, experience, and best practice capabilities, with our specialized and agile intelligence.